# IP subnet % presence

**URL:** <https://mpsocial.com/t/ip-subnet-presence/12284>\
**Category:** Tools of the trade\
**Created:** [April 23, 2017, 9:20am UTC](https://mpsocial.com/t/ip-subnet-presence/12284 "2017-04-23T09:20:24Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![XXX](https://mpsocial.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/x/a9adbd/32.png) [@XXX](https://mpsocial.com/u/XXX)\
**Post date:** [April 23, 2017, 9:20am UTC](https://mpsocial.com/t/ip-subnet-presence/12284/1 "2017-04-23T09:20:24Z")

</div>

I imagine on normal (residential) **ip subnets,** something like 0-5% of ips are being active on x social platform(ig,fb,pin…) in 24-48h timespan.

But for our purposes(proxies) there is usually ~ 10-100% subnet presence… Isn’t this alone a dead giveaway?

Not saying that this is enough to get banned, but sites are probably detecting it and incrementing account spam score by a lot just from this.

Am I wrong? Anyone knows more about this?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![igundermyempire](https://mpsocial.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/i/73ab20/32.png) [@igundermyempire](https://mpsocial.com/u/igundermyempire)\
**Post date:** [April 23, 2017, 10:38am UTC](https://mpsocial.com/t/ip-subnet-presence/12284/2 "2017-04-23T10:38:46Z")

</div>

Don’t do it then 🙂  
You already know they can do that but would they? Only they and some testers will know.  
If you still want to risk then try to simulate a busy internet cafe / restaurant with Wi-Fi things like that.  
Just watch out when you do this on Facebook as they are so obsessed with catching unnatural users on their platform
